Grand and Peyton Drive 12:00 noon!
In the Independent- https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/midterms-elections-countdown-2026-analysis-b3044875.html The Iran war, Elon Musk’s cash and who decides to spend money in Texas could all be curve balls this cycle, Eric Garcia writes Friday 04 September 2026 14:13 EDT On …
– FROM BIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER (BPC), JULY 17, 2026 https://bipartisanpolicy.org/article/five-things-to-know-about-the-save-act/ This page was originally published on February 2, 2026 and last updated on July 17, 2026. The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE America) Act requires voters to …
from NYT Caroline Soler Polling researcher- July 7 Recent polling on the congressional generic ballot shows Democrats with a modest advantage. The party out of power typically gains …
By Austin Turner/ Jeff Nguyen Updated on: June 4, 2026 / 4:38 PM PDT / CBS LA Add CBS News on Google Millions of Californians filled out their 2026 primary election ballots over the last …
On April 29, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling that effectively dismantled key protections of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, significantly curbing federal oversight of racial discrimination in redistricting. The decision, arising …
Mar 04
On February 28, 2026, the United States launched military operations in Iran after weeks of preparation. U.S. actions in Iran risk catastrophic consequences for Iran, the region, and the United States. Civilian deaths are mounting, and the U.S. has already lost troops and aircraft. The risk of wider war is grave.
Meanwhile, Congress has not authorized the current military operations. And the costs of these operations are rising quickly during a time when Americans are struggling to afford basic needs.
This fact sheet offers an initial point-in-time estimate of the operation and support costs of major military equipment — aircraft and naval assets — deployed to the region in recent weeks.
Deployed systems include two aircraft carrier strike groups and related naval support, as well as more than 200 military aircraft. We also include a ten percent increase over the normal operating costs for these systems to account for the heightened pace of combat operations.
Daily operations in and around Iran for these major military systems are costing taxpayers an estimated $59.39 million per day.
That $59.39 million a day could instead cover the daily costs of Medicaid for more than four million Americans, or SNAP (food stamps) for more than 9.5 million Americans. Both programs were subject to significant cuts under last year’s H.R. 1, with millions of Americans at risk of going hungry and without healthcare as a result.
| Components | Daily Costs |
| Naval Deployment | $30.679 million |
| Aircraft Deployment | $23.314 million |
| 10% increase over normal operation costs for combat operations | $5.399 million |
| Daily operations of major equipment | $59.39 million |
About the numbers
This estimate does not include operating costs for all military assets previously in the region; troop deployments except those required to staff the included assets; munitions; or the original procurement or development costs of the ships or aircraft deployed in the region. Including these figures would raise the total considerably.
The situation in Iran is changing quickly. This estimate represents the best available information, largely from media reports, at a particular point in time. The daily costs cited here could change as a result of escalation, deescalation, or other factors. As more information becomes available, we expect to update these figures.
The death toll and the costs continue to rise. And the Pentagon is spending massively for an unauthorized war of choice while Americans struggle to afford basic necessities.
You can download this fact sheet, along with citations, as a PDF here.
Feb 02
SACRAMENTO – On Saturday, January 31st, the California Democratic Party is launching a statewide texting campaign to recruit hundreds of Democrats to run for local office, with a focus in rural areas where GOP incumbents often run uncontested. This is CADEM’s fifth cycle participating in this national campaign by Contest Every Race to ensure that no Republican goes unchallenged.
The California Democratic Party is partnering with County Democratic Parties and Contest Every Race again to launch this program as evidence continues to build that more Democrats running in local elections boosts Democratic voter turnout and enthusiasm, which is key to ensuring Democrats win targeted congressional races and take back the House of Representatives in November.
The 2026 candidate recruitment program is targeting 348 local down-ballot races across the following 33 counties: Alameda, Amador, Butte, El Dorado, Glenn, Humboldt, Imperial, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mendocino, Mono, Monterey, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Riverside, Sacramento, San Bernardino, San Mateo, Santa Barbara, Santa Clara, Sierra, Siskiyou, Solano, Stanislaus, Tehama, Tulare, Tuolumne, Ventura and Yuba.
“We’re proud to partner with Contest Every Race to recruit strong Democrats in every corner of the state who will deliver for Californians,” said Yvette Martinez, Executive Director of the California Democratic Party. “We know that electing Democrats at the local level delivers real results for working families—from good paying jobs and affordable housing to stronger schools and accessible health care. By building power locally, we’re strengthening our democracy and ensuring opportunity is within reach for every Californian.”
The California Democratic Party is the largest state party in the nation with more than 10 million members, and helped deliver a resounding victory for Proposition 50 in last year’s Special Election.
Jan 02
Nicholas Riccardi, Associated Press
If history is a guide, Republicans stand a good chance of losing control of the House of Representatives in 2026. They have just a slim majority in the chamber, and the incumbent party usually gives up seats in midterm elections.
President Donald Trump, whose loss of the House halfway through his first term led to two impeachments, is trying to keep history from repeating — and doing so in ways his opponents say are intended to manipulate next year’s election landscape
He has rallied his party to remake congressional maps across the country to create more conservative-leaning House seats, an effort that could end up backfiring on him. He’s directed his administration to target Democratic politicians, activists and donors. And, Democrats worry, he’s flexing his muscles to intervene in the midterms like no administration ever has.
Democrats and other critics point to how Trump has sent the military into Democratic cities over the objections of Democratic mayors and governors. They note that he’s pushed the Department of Homeland Security to be so aggressive that at one point its agents handcuffed a Democratic U.S. senator. And some warn that a Republican-controlled Congress could fail to seat winning candidates if Democrats reclaim the House majority, recalling Trump’s efforts to stay in power even after voters rejected him in 2020, leading to the violent attack by his supporters on the U.S. Capitol.
Regarding potential military deployments, Ken Martin, chairman of the Democratic National Committee, told The Associated Press: “What he is going to do is send those troops there, and keep them there all the way through the next election, because guess what? If people are afraid of leaving their house, they’re probably not going to leave their house to go vote on Election Day. That’s how he stays in power.”
Democrats sounded similar alarms just before November’s elections, and yet there were no significant incidents. California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a frequent Trump antagonist who also warns about a federal crackdown on voting in 2026, predicted that masked immigration agents would show up at the polls in his state, where voters were considering a ballot measure to counter Trump’s redistricting push.
There were no such incidents in November, and the measure to redraw California’s congressional lines in response to Trump’s efforts elsewhere won in a landslide.
White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said the concerns about the midterms come from Democratic politicians who are “fearmongering to score political points with the radical left flank of the Democrat party that they are courting ahead of their doomed-to-fail presidential campaigns.”
She described their concerns as “baseless conspiracy theories.”
Susie Wiles, Trump’s chief of staff, denied that Trump was planning to use the military to try to suppress votes.
“I say it is categorically false, will not happen. It’s just wrongheaded,” she told Vanity Fair for an interview that was published earlier in December.
DNC litigation director Dan Freeman said he hasn’t seen an indication that Trump will send immigration enforcement agents to polling places during the midterms, but is wary.
He said the DNC filed public records requests in an attempt to learn more about any such plans and is drafting legal pleadings it could file if Trump sends armed federal agents to the polls or otherwise intervenes in the elections.
“We’re not taking their word for it,” Freeman said in an interview.
November’s off-year elections may not be the best indicator of what could lie ahead. They were scattered in a handful of states, and Trump showed only modest interest until late in the fall when his Department of Justice announced it was sending federal monitors to California and New Jersey to observe voting in a handful of counties. It was a bureaucratic step that had no impact on voting, even as it triggered alarm from Democrats.
Alexandra Chandler, the legal director of Protect Democracy, a group that has clashed with Trump over his role in elections, said she was heartened by the lack of drama during the 2025 voting.
“We have so many positive signs we can look to,” Chandler said, citing not only a quiet election but GOP senators’ resistance to Trump’s demands to eliminate the filibuster and the widespread resistance to Trump’s demand that television host Jimmy Kimmel lose his job because of his criticism of the president. “There are limits” on Trump’s power, she noted.
WATCH: Capehart and Gorman on Democrats’ election wins and Trump’s push to end the filibuster
“We will have elections in 2026,” Chandler said. “People don’t have to worry about that.”
Under the Constitution, a president has limited tools to intervene in elections, which are run by the states. Congress can help set rules for federal elections, but states administer their own election operations and oversee the counting of ballots.
When Trump tried to singlehandedly revise election rules with a sweeping executive order shortly after returning to office, the courts stepped in and stopped him, citing the lack of a constitutional role for the president. Trump later promised another order, possibly targeting mail ballots and voting machines, but it has yet to materialize.
Still, there’s plenty of ways a president can cause problems, said Rick Hasen, a UCLA law professor.
Trump unsuccessfully pushed Georgia’s top election official to “find” him enough votes to be declared the winner there in 2020 and could try similar tactics in Republican-dominated states in November. Likewise, Hasen said, Trump could spread misinformation to undermine confidence in vote tallies, as he has done routinely ahead of elections.
It’s harder to do that in more lopsided contests, as many in 2025 turned into, Hasen noted.
“Concerns about Trump interfering in 2026 are real; they’re not frivolous,” Hasen said. “They’re also not likely, but these are things people need to be on guard for.”
One administration move that has alarmed election officials is a federal demand from his Department of Justice for detailed voter data from the states. The administration has sued the District of Columbia and at least 21 states, most of them controlled by Democrats, after they refused to turn over all the information the DOJ sought.
“What the DOJ is trying to do is something that should frighten everybody across the political spectrum,” said David Becker, a former Justice Department voting rights attorney and executive director of the Center for Election Innovation & Research. “They’re trying to use the power of the executive to bully states into turning over highly sensitive data — date of birth, Social Security numbers, driver’s license, the Holy Trinity of identity theft — hand it over to the DOJ for who knows what use.”
Voting rights lawyers and election officials have been preparing for months for the midterms, trying to ensure there are ways to counter misinformation and ensure state election systems are easy to explain. Both major parties are expected to stand up significant campaigns around the mechanics of voting: Democrats mounting what they call a “voter protection” effort to monitor for problems while Republicans focus on what they call “election integrity.”
Freeman, the DNC litigation director who previously worked in the DOJ’s voting section, said his hiring this year was part of a larger effort by the DNC to beef up its in-house legal efforts ahead of the midterms. He said the committee has been filling gaps in voting rights law enforcement that the DOJ has typically covered, including informing states that they can’t illegally purge citizens from their voter rolls.
Tina Barton, co-chair of the Committee on Safe and Secure Elections, a coalition of law enforcement and election officials who advise jurisdictions on de-escalation and how to respond to emergencies at polling places, says interest in the group’s trainings has “exploded” in recent weeks.
“There’s a lot at stake, and that’s going to cause a lot of emotions,” Barton said.
Associated Press writers Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Julie Carr Smyth in Columbus, Ohio, and Ali Swenson in New York contributed to this report.
Nov 29
In Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/markjoyella/2025/11/29/white-house-ramps-up-war-on-journalists-by-naming-media-offender-of-the-week/ ByMark Joyella, Senior Contributor. Mark Joyella is a former broadcast journalist who covers media. Nov 29, 2025, 06:08pm EST
The Trump Administration is intensifying its war on the “fake news media” by launching a “Media Offender of the Week” page on the official White House website. The page, which names journalists from CBS News, The Boston Globe and The Independent, carries the subtitle “Misleading. Biased. Exposed.”
Named as “media offenders” are Boston Globe politics producer Alyssa Vega, Independent White House correspondent Andrew Feinberg and senior Washington correspondent Eric Garcia, and CBS News chief White House correspondent Nancy Cordes.
The journalists are accused of misrepresenting and exaggerating “President Trump’s calls for Democrat accountability,” the page claims. “The media misrepresented President Trump’s call for Members of Congress to be held accountable for inciting sedition by saying that he called for their “execution.”
The reporters singled out by the White House had reported on six Democratic senators who featured in a video released last week reminding members of the armed forces that they don’t have to follow illegal orders–even if those orders come directly from the president.
“The threats to our Constitution aren’t just coming from abroad, but from right here right at home. Our laws are clear. You can refuse illegal orders,” the senators said in the video. “No one has to carry out orders that violate the law or our Constitution.”
President Trump blasted the video, suggesting that the lawmakers were guilty of sedition and saying they should face consequences. One of the six senators in the video, Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona, told ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel Tuesday that the administration’s reaction to the video–including calls from the Pentagon to investigate Kelly–was intended to sow fear and shut down criticism.
“It is right out of the playbook, you know, the playbook of authoritarianism. That’s what they do. They try to suppress speech,” Kelly said. “Every one of us has First Amendment speech rights, and I think the president is infringing on those and he is sending, he is sending a pretty strong message. You do not want to cross him, and your loyalty should be to him. It should not. It should always be to the Constitution.”

On the White House “media offenders” page, the administration suggested that “the Democrats and Fake News Media subversively implied that President Trump had issued illegal orders to service members. Every order President Trump has issued has been lawful. It is dangerous for sitting Members of Congress to incite insubordination in the United States’ military, and President Trump called for them to be held accountable.”
While the White House claimed the senators in the video were “calling for service members to disobey their chain of command,” the actual content of the video said that federal law does not allow members of the military to break the law, even if they’ve been ordered to do so by a superior officer–or the commander-in-chief.
“Don’t give up the ship,” said Sen. Elissa Slotkin in the video.
Nov 04
CNN: 5 things to know for Nov. 4: Election Day 2025, Aviation safety, Food stamps, Michigan FBI raid, Dick CheneyHello readers — welcome to a special Election Day edition of 5 Things. Voters will head to the polls today in critical races across the country, from New York to California. It’s the first major electoral test of President Donald Trump’s second term, and it may offer insights into how next year’s midterm elections will unfold.
CNN is following key elections in the coming hours, including the race for mayor in New York City, the races for governor in New Jersey and Virginia, and the Proposition 50 redistricting measure on the ballot in California. Here’s what you should know:
📍 New York
New York City voters will choose their next mayor today, closing out an eventful campaign between Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani, independent candidate Andrew Cuomo and Republican Curtis Sliwa. Mamdani, a 34-year-old democratic socialist, is leading in the polls. He has electrified young voters but has also come under fire from some for a lack of governing experience. On Monday, President Trump urged New Yorkers to vote for former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, saying he has a “Record of Success.” Cuomo dismissed Trump’s endorsement, insisting that the president was simply opposing Mamdani. Polls in New York close at 9 p.m. ET.
📍 New Jersey
Democratic Rep. Mikie Sherrill faces Republican Jack Ciattarelli in the race for New Jersey governor. Ciattarelli has leaned on his support from President Trump in the traditionally Democratic-leaning state and has repeatedly praised the administration’s policies on issues from immigration to tax reforms. Meanwhile, several high-profile Democrats — including former President Barack Obama — hit the campaign trail for Sherrill. She is the frontrunner in the race, but a win is not guaranteed as public polls have found her with a single-digit edge over Ciattarelli. Polls in New Jersey close at 8 p.m. ET
📍 Virginia
In Virginia, Republican Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears faces former Democratic Rep. Abigail Spanberger. The winner will become the state’s first female governor. Polls show Democrat Abigail Spanberger has a stable, double-digit advantage in the race. On Monday, President Trump called in to an election eve tele-rally in support of the Virginia Republican statewide ticket, but notably stopped short of endorsing Earle-Sears. Both the Virginia and New Jersey governor’s races, which are held a year after presidential elections, are widely viewed as an important gauge of the nation’s political mood almost a year into a new presidency. Polls in Virginia close at 7 p.m. ET.
📍 California
California voters will decide whether to adopt a new congressional map that could shape control of the House of Representatives next year. Democratic leaders hope Californians will vote yes on Proposition 50 to help their party win five more seats in the House. So far, Republicans have enacted new maps in four states for a potential net gain of nine seats. Some analysts tell CNN the ballot measure, backed by Gov. Gavin Newsom, may pass resoundingly this week. Either outcome will carry huge implications in the redistricting arms race playing out across the country. Polls in California close at 11 p.m.
As the US government shutdown drags on, more air traffic controllers who are working without pay are missing shifts or taking on side jobs to make ends meet. This has raised concerns among some travelers about whether it’s safe to fly during the government shutdown, with aviation workers facing stress that could potentially affect their job performance. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said some delays at US airports are intentional to give controllers on duty more time to manage flights safely. Several aviation experts tell CNN that passenger safety is not being compromised, but travelers should plan for long waits — sometimes several hours. In recent days, staffing shortages and delays have been widespread in Chicago, Denver, Houston and Newark.
The Trump administration said Monday that food stamp recipients will only get half of their typical benefits in November, and for many, that assistance will likely be delayed. The US Department of Agriculture said in a court filing that it will only tap into the program’s contingency fund, which doesn’t have enough money to cover enrollees’ full allotments during the government shutdown. The agency said it will not use an additional pot of money to make up the difference in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP. Nearly 42 million Americans receive food stamps, providing households just over $350 a month, on average, according to the most recent USDA data.
Two men face federal charges for allegedly plotting an ISIS-inspired Halloween attack in the US — possibly on the scale of the 2015 Paris terror attacks that killed at least 130 people, authorities say. An FBI raid on Halloween morning stunned neighbors in Dearborn, Michigan, the second-safest city in the state. The suspects had “multiple AR-15 rifles, tactical gear, and a detailed plan to carry out an attack on American soil,” Attorney General Pam Bondi said on social media. Dearborn is home to the largest concentration of Arab Americans in the US and has frequently faced Islamophobic and hateful remarks. Members of the community, including neighbors and attorneys for the suspects taken into custody, say they are skeptical of the allegations.
Former Vice President Dick Cheney has died at age 84, according to a statement from his family. The 46th vice president, who served alongside Republican President George W. Bush for two terms between 2001 and 2009, was for decades a towering and polarizing Washington power player. He was America’s most powerful modern vice president and chief architect of the “war on terror,” who helped lead the country into the ill-fated Iraq war on faulty assumptions. Cheney was plagued by cardiovascular disease for most of his adult life. He survived a series of heart attacks and lived many years in retirement after a heart transplant in 2012 that he hailed in a 2014 interview as “the gift of life itself.”


In western Jamaica, communities remain isolated after Hurricane Melissa tore through the island. CNN’s David Culver reports from towns where neighbors dig out by hand, hospital staffers work in ruins, and yet hope still endures amid the devastation. Watch the video here.
Today’s edition of 5 Things AM was edited and produced by CNN’s Andrew Torgan.
Oct 07
Ballots are arriving in mailboxes across California for the upcoming Nov. 4 special election that has launched the Golden State into the center of a national battle over control of Congress.
The only issue on most Bay Area voters’ ballots is Proposition 50, a measure to redraw California’s congressional maps.
Here’s an explanation of Prop 50, a rundown of who supports and opposes it and what arguments both sides are making to win over voters, along with links to read more about the issue.
Prop 50 would replace California’s congressional maps, drawn by an independent commission, with new maps drawn by Democrats that aim to flip five seats from Republican to Democratic control. They are designed to help Democrats wrest control of the U.S. House of Representatives to provide a check on President Donald Trump, and to counter moves by Republican-controlled states that are redrawing their own maps to favor Republicans. The maps would be in place for elections in 2026, 2028 and 2030. California’s independent redistricting commission would resume drawing congressional maps following the 2030 census.
Prop 50 is one component of a nationwide redistricting battle that began when the Trump administration started pressuring lawmakers in Texas to redraw their maps.
Mid-decade redistricting is rare. States typically redraw their congressional maps every 10 years after each census. But Republicans are under pressure this year to make maps more favorable to their party in the 2026 midterms.
Republicans hold 219 seats in the House, compared with Democrats’ 213. But that majority will be tough for the GOP to hold in the midterms, when a president’s party typically loses seats.
Republicans hold 25 of the 38 congressional districts in Texas, the second most populous state. The Republican-controlled Texas Legislature passed new maps this year that are designed to increase the number of Republican districts to 30.
In California, the most populous state, Democrats hold 43 of 52 congressional seats. Democrats also control California’s state Legislature. But, unlike Republicans in Texas, California Democrats can’t just pass new maps on their own.
That’s because California voters in 2010 gave that power to an independent redistricting commission where Democrats and Republicans are equally represented.
To get around that process, Gov. Gavin Newsom and his allies called a special election to seek voter approval of the new maps.
Supporters argue Californians should vote yes to provide a check on Trump’s power. With a Republican-controlled House of Representatives and Senate and a Supreme Court dominated by conservatives, Trump has been able to dramatically reshape the federal government without any real pushback from Democrats.
“If we lose here, we are going to have total Republican control in the House, the Senate and the White House for at least two more years,” Newsom wrote in a recent fundraising appeal to supporters. “If we win here, we can put a check on Trump for his final two years.”
Supporters have raised more than $90 million from a base of donors 500 times larger than opponents’. The campaign has reported more than 65,000 individual donors, the vast majority of whom have given less than $150. But the campaign has some ultra-wealthy donors, too. The biggest are the Fund for Policy Reform, an organization founded and funded by Democratic megadonor George Soros, and the House Majority PAC, which works to elect Democrats to Congress. Each has given $10 million. Other top donors to the effort include labor unions. The National Education Association and the California Teachers Association have each contributed $3 million, and the California Nurses Association has kicked in $2.6 million.
Michael Moritz, the 71-year-old billionaire Pacific Heights venture capitalist and publisher of the San Francisco Standard, has contributed $2.5 million.
Newsom’s campaign has spent about $7 million on digital advertising and about $18 million on television ads, according to the most recent campaign finance filings.
The campaign is focused on an anti-Trump message and is running ads featuring national political figures like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y.
That reflects the nationalized nature of the campaign. Almost half of the campaign’s donors live outside the state.
Opponents have focused less on national politics. They point out that the measure would take power from the independent commission and put it back in the hands of politicians. They argue that gerrymandering – the process of shaping districts to favor a particular politician or political party – is always wrong and shouldn’t be embraced in California. They’ve pointed out that the proposed districts are designed to dilute the power of rural communities that typically vote for Republicans.
Most of the opponents’ cash has come from Charles Munger Jr., who has given $32 million of the total $40 million raised. Munger is a retired Palo Alto physicist and son of billionaire Charles Munger, who served as the vice chairman of Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway. More than a decade ago, Munger Jr. bankrolled the campaigns to create the independent redistricting commission and give it power to draw the state’s political districts.
Aug 30
In Cal Matters by Maya C. Miller and Jeanne Kuang August 21, 2025
The California Legislature today approved his proposal calling for a special election on a ballot measure that would suspend the state’s current congressional districts, which were drawn by an independent commission, and replace them with a map intended to favor Democrats.
The Assembly passed the measure 57 to 20, and lawmakers on the floor erupted in applause even before they closed the vote. The Senate passed it hours later on a party-line vote, 30-8. Newsom declared a Nov. 4 special election shortly afterward.
At a press conference to promote the upcoming campaign for what will appear on the ballot as Proposition 50, he said it was time for Democrats to “play hardball” in response to the Trump administration’s moves to “advance their power.”
“We tried to hold hands and talk about the way the world should be,” he said. “We can’t just think differently, we have to act differently.”
California voters in a 2010 ballot measure backed independent redistricting for congressional districts, a process meant to cultivate fair, competitive elections. Democrats say they’re reluctant to give up that system, even temporarily, but believe they have to in order to counter Trump’s bid to retain control of Congress after 2026.
“If unaddressed, Texas’ actions – which occur without the vote of the populace – will disenfranchise California,” said Assemblymember Josh Lowenthal, a Long Beach Democrat whose father had pushed for nonpartisan redistricting as a state lawmaker and Congressman.
“It’s imperative that Californians have a voice in selecting the political party that controls Congress in 2026,” said Lowenthal in an emotional speech from the floor before the vote. “So today, I proudly join with my father, the architect of this commission, in urging its temporary suspension.”
Republicans before the vote pleaded with their colleagues to resist following Texas in the race to the gerrymandering bottom.

“There’s really only one way to stop – someone has to refrain from striking back, and show a better way,” said Assemblymember James Gallagher, Republican of Chico and the minority leader.
Lawmakers on Thursday also passed a bill containing the new congressional map voters will be asked to approve, sending it to Newsom’s desk, and an additional bill that will facilitate and fund the special election. Newsom signed both of them today.
The change is intended to be temporary; the measure that will go before voters requires the state to return to nonpartisan map-drawing after the 2030 census.
Newsom kicked off the special election scramble after Trump declared that he was “entitled” to five more GOP congressional seats in Texas. He demanded that Lone Star State lawmakers shore up Republicans’ razor thin, three-seat House majority by redrawing their congressional maps mid-decade. When Gov. Greg Abbott indicated Texas would redistrict, Newsom said California would retaliate.
Democrats today hold 43 of the state’s 52 congressional seats. The Newsom-backed maps transform five Republican seats into districts that heavily favor Democrats. By ousting those incumbents, Newsom would effectively essentially cancel out Trump’s effort in Texas. The maps also strengthen Democrats’ hold on three other competitive California districts, making it harder for the GOP to flip them next year.
California Republican lawmakers spent the week throwing up a variety of procedural blocks to try to stop the bills’ fast-tracked progress through the legislature, including by asking the California Supreme Court to weigh in on their challenge to the short time between the legislation’s public release on Monday and their final vote on the Assembly and Senate floors on Thursday.
They demanded an end to the redistricting arms race nationwide, with some willing to condemn Texas and other red states that Trump has urged to redraw their maps.
They argued that Newsom’s maps unfairly split some communities into multiple congressional districts, and that some Democratic lawmakers were biased given their reported personal interest in running for Congress.
In particularly acrimonious spells on the Senate and Assembly floors, the two parties sparred over who had started the fight. Republicans, accused of insufficient opposition to the Trump administration, in turn argued Democratic lawmakers were overly loyal to Newsom.
But Republican efforts to derail the measure ran up against both political numbers and longtime legislative practice in California.
Polling shows most Democratic voters want the party to do more to fight the Trump administration. In the past few weeks, Democratic lawmakers, who command a three-quarters supermajority in both chambers, have overwhelmingly fallen in line behind Newsom on the redistricting effort.
Every year, lawmakers regularly reveal last-minute deals that they fast-track for passage 72 hours later, in a way that nominally complies with state constitutional requirements.
The timing of the votes may be litigated, but California Republicans have already lost in court once. The state Supreme Court on Wednesday night declined to take up the GOP’s timing-based challenge to the map-drawing effort.
GOP lawmakers acknowledged they’ll likely have to fight the issue at the polls.
“We will defeat this, if it’s not here in the Capitol, it will be in a courtroom or it will be at the ballot box,” Assemblymember Alexandra Macedo said this week.
Aug 06
Gathering reportedly to include Pam Bondi, Kash Patel and Susan Wiles to discuss strategy for dealing with scandal
JD Vance, the US vice-president, will reportedly host a meeting on Wednesday evening at his residence with a handful of senior Trump administration officials to discuss their strategy for dealing with the ongoing scandal surrounding the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
The gathering, first reported by CNN, is reportedly set to include the attorney general, Pam Bondi; the deputy attorney general, Todd Blanche; the FBI director, Kash Patel; and the White House chief of staff, Susie Wiles.
Sources familiar with the gathering told CNN and ABC News that the officials will be discussing whether to release the transcript of the justice department’s recent interview with Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s associate and a convicted sex trafficker.

Two weeks ago the justice department sent Blanche, who is also one of Donald Trump’s former personal lawyers, to interview Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year prison for sex trafficking and other crimes.
That meeting lasted two days and details from it have not been made public.
According to ABC News, the administration is considering publicly releasing the transcripts from the interview as soon as this week.
Last week Maxwell was quietly transferred from a Florida prison to a lower-security facility in Texas. Trump claimed to reporters that he “didn’t know” about the transfer.
The Trump administration has faced mounting pressure and a bipartisan backlash after the justice department announced it would not be releasing additional documents related to Epstein, despite earlier promises by Trump and Bondi that they would do so.
Epstein, who died in prison in New York in 2019 while awaiting federal trial, is the subject of countless conspiracy theories, in part due to his ties to high-profile and powerful individuals.
On Tuesday, the House oversight committee subpoenaed the justice department for files related to the Epstein sex-trafficking investigation and issued subpoenas for depositions from several prominent figures.
They included the former president Bill Clinton; the former secretary of state Hillary Clinton; multiple former attorneys general, including Jeff Sessions, Alberto Gonzales, William Barr and Merrick Garland; and the former FBI directors James Comey and Robert Mueller.
Axios pointed out that Trump’s former labor secretary Alex Acosta was absent from the list despite his involvement in the 2008 plea deal with Epstein when Acosta was a top federal prosecutor in Florida. Axios noted that Acosta’s boss during his time in Florida, Gonzales, is on the subpoena list.
Maxwell, who was found guilty of sex trafficking and other charges in December 2021, is appealing her conviction to the supreme court, citing Epstein’s plea agreement. This week her attorneys also opposed the government’s request to unseal grand jury transcripts related to the Epstein case.
“Jeffrey Epstein is dead,” her lawyers wrote. “Ghislaine Maxwell is not. Whatever interest the public may have in Epstein, that interest cannot justify a broad intrusion into grand jury secrecy in a case where the defendant is alive, her legal options are viable and her due process rights remain.”
Maxwell also said last week that she was willing to testify before Congress if she was granted immunity.
The Democratic congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi, who has introduced a resolution in Congress that opposes Maxwell receiving a presidential pardon or any other form of clemency, told CNN on Wednesday that he believes the “vast majority of Americans oppose any form of clemency for Maxwell, and we need to say that with one voice in Congress as well”.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment relating to the Vance meeting.
Jun 27
Shrouded in secrecy, the US law enforcement agency has become a kind of domestic stormtrooper for Maga’s agenda
Across the US, group chats and community threads have started spiking with warnings. Not just the typical alerts about traffic or out of service subway stations, but where and when an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) raid was last seen. What places to avoid. What the plainclothes agents might look like.
“Hey all,” a Brooklyn, New York, resident wrote in a closed chat with neighbors last week. “A little birdie just told me ICE is out.”
Another person quickly followed suit.
“The witness says they saw 3 people picked up by 2 agents with ICE on their vests,” they said, with details on where the location of the arrests occurred and what the undercover vehicles looked like. “If anyone sees any ICE agents or activity you can drop a description at this link for local rapid-response folks.”
These kinds of exchanges are commonplace now in in America. There have been Ice raids under previous administrations, but it’s notable that an American law enforcement agency has struck such a successful campaign of measurable, national fear.
Border crossings are at historic lows. Fans are avoiding an international soccer tournament featuring the world’s biggest clubs and global superstars, in fear of Ice agents. Taco truck workers are being arrested. Some farms are so short on field hands that crops are rotting in the sun.
Even a four-year-old child and lawful US citizen with cancer was deported to Honduras along with their family. In an appearance on CBS News, Trump’s border czar, Tom Homan, showed indifference to the case.
“When you enter the country illegally and you know you’re here illegally and you choose to have a US citizen child,” he said, justifying the deportation of a young cancer patient, “that’s on you, that’s not on this administration.”
In the public consciousness, Ice has become defined as Trump’s personal rogue agency doing his bidding regardless of accepted norms and laws. They have become a kind of domestic enforcer for Maga’s agenda, rounding up “illegals” and deporting what they say are criminals to El Salvador, to face justice in a place without trials. When Trump promised “retribution” in the lead-up to his second presidency, activists say these are now the soldiers carrying it out.
Many people have wondered, is this DHS and Ice mandate even legal? Answers to that are varied, aspects of which are being argued over in courts, but in theory, the marriage of a national police force with local policing should have boundaries.
“So long as Ice, DHS and other federal agencies define their missions narrowly on immigration matters, local police can and should remain separate,” said the Columbia University law professor Jeffrey Fagan.
“But as we saw in [Los Angeles], these boundaries become blurry when civilians gather to protest and raise issues that spill over to the public safety mission of local police.”
Protests over mass Ice roundups in LA, led to Trump sending 4,000 national guard troops (against the wishes of the state) and deploying 700 active-duty marines. California has taken the Trump administration to court over what it sees as the unlawful deployment of the national guard to counter protests even the Los Angeles police department characterized as mostly under control.
“The concerns that animated the protest of federal actions inevitably will spill over to local police when demonstrations take place,” said Fagan. “Keeping them separate will become increasingly difficult as the federal immigration campaign grows wider and deeper.”
If Ice isn’t carrying out the arrests, their actions have undoubtedly spread chaos and unprecedented uses of state power. In late April, the FBI arrested a Wisconsin judge and alleged she obstructed immigration authorities arresting a man in her courthouse.
Facing up against Ice has equally become a Democratic and leftwing rallying cry and all over the US, opposition to the raids have grown from the grassroots. Some polls show the deportations have become a toxic circus for Trump and the Republican party. Rival politicians have also seized the moment to showcase their resistance: the California senator Alex Padilla was arrested and cuffed while trying to question the DHS secretary, Kristi Noem, at a news conference. In another dystopian scene at an immigration court, the New York City comptroller and mayoral candidate, Brad Lander, was brazenly arrested by masked agents who hauled him away.
“I don’t know of any publicly available information on who exactly these masked men are,” said Heidi Beirich, co-founder of the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism, who teaches a course at the University of Southern California on policing.
“We know that agents from the IRS and other executive departments have been reassigned to this work, but it is all a bit mysterious.”
Beirich continued: “The fact that they won’t identify themselves in many cases that have been reported on makes this all the more ominous. It’s part of Trump’s authoritarian playbook to have people arrested by agents who don’t give their names or their agencies and just swoop people off the street into unmarked vehicles.”
Dictatorships around the world and countries with major corruption problems often have masked police who protect their identities from the public purview. For example, in Vladimir Putin’s Russia, a country and leader admired by Trump, masked police are a regular fixture. Now, Ice have adopted the tactic on the streets of the US.
DHS propaganda has also become weaponized as a tool of the administration, breeding fear and promoting ratlines. In a reference to second world war posters asking citizens to keep watch for, what was at the time, a real threat of enemy spies in the country, DHS posted a similar image on X.
“Help your country locate and arrest illegal aliens,” the agency posted, with a caricature of Uncle Sam and a DHS number to call in sightings.
Beirich says the blurred lines between what is either a federal law enforcement agency or Trump’s own private armed force, is now tough to discern for some.
“Clearly, Ice and DHS have become much more ominous and clouded in mystery, and clearly weapons for the Trump regime to violate rights and literally disappear people,” she said.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | ||||
Please contact Jim Gallagher Club Chair, at chinovalleydemocrats21@gmail.com for information regarding the Club or this website. Your comments and questions are appreciated.
Membership is only $25 annually.
Copy and paste into your calendar
©2016 California Democratic Council
Paid for by theMade with by Graphene Themes.